I couldn't help but identify with a lab rat when they started greasing me up and sticking wires all over my chest. Seriously, an alien autopsy would probably have been less invasive. A good time it was not. Maybe that's why my feathers got all ruffled when I thought about today's topic.
I keep reading ... and keep reading ... AND KEEP READING about the scourge of the .99 cent book. Those of you who are in the ePublishing Circle of Trust will immediately know what I'm talking about. Those of you outside the Circle might not, so let me catch you up.
(I'm going to simplify a little a lot, but there are lots of little linkable words and phrases if you want to learn more.)
A little while back a small family-run Internet retailer named FREAKING AMAZON--I heard they got their start as shoe cobblers--decided they would let any old author upload their books for free to be sold on their site in electronic fashion. Amazon, by this point, had officially become the largest retailer of paper books on the planet. In short: Readers knew Amazon. Readers trusted Amazon.
Coincidentally, Amazon had also popularized the eReader with their snazzy little device, Kindle. For the historians out there, they released it in November, 2007 @ $399 US. I say "popularized", because the Kindle wasn't the first eReader, it just happened to be the first REALLY consumer friendly one in both price and function. (Yes, they were once MORE expensive than $399.) Amazon had also become THE place to purchase eBooks--the things you read on an eReader. Convenient? I think so.
At the point authors were invited to share their wares on Amazon, eReaders were still relatively niche gadgets. A little too pricey, and a little too unknown for the common woman or man. That changed as other companies began to throw their names into the electronic book arena. Two years after the release of the Kindle, physical book retail giant Branes & Noble released their own reader (Nook) and announced that they too would allow authors to self-publish on their website. Shortly after B&N, Apple developed their own eBookstore. All the while, a major Internet eBook retailer named Smashwords was also allowing authors to self-publish. Even Google got in on the action.
Fast-forward to Now
eBooks and eReaders are HUGE. Sales of electronic books are surpassing their paper cousins and that gap is only going to widen with the growing number of popular electronic gadgets capable of functioning as a reader. As a result, many authors are running to get on board the eTrain.
Economics ... BLECH
An initially unnoticed aspect of authors being able to circumvent the traditional publishing process--you know bleed tears, find an agent, bed-down with a publisher and hope your book made it to the front of the bookstore for a couple of days--and self-publish their work was pricing flexibility. All of the sites that allowed for DIY publishing also let the author more-or-less set the price of the product (a privilege usually afforded to only publishers). In the old model, the author's job was to write, not worry about profit margin. A good thing for many authors who feel as I do about the E word.
So what did authors do when they put on their big boy and girl business undies? What any entrepreneur would do, of course! They undercut the poop out of the competition. Why? Why does Walmart sell things cheaper than everyone else? Because they can afford to. The Indie/DIY author was no different.
eBooks from traditional publishers are more expensive, and here's why. You're going to pay more for Stephen King and Twilight because the big traditional publishers are corporations with big payrolls. They have many editors, secretaries, etc., etc. to feed. They also publish more than one or two books in a year. That requires coin. Furthermore, Stephen King and Twilight are responsible for making money for all the lesser-known authors who might not earn back the investment publishers make in them. Combine that with the cost of making paper books (ya know like ink, shipping, feeding the gnomes who blow on the binding glue to make it dry it faster, etc.), and you've got a formula for mark up.
Here's a pretty solid list of why traditional publishing is 'spensive.
So what did authors do when they put on their big boy and girl business undies? What any entrepreneur would do, of course! They undercut the poop out of the competition. Why? Why does Walmart sell things cheaper than everyone else? Because they can afford to. The Indie/DIY author was no different.
eBooks from traditional publishers are more expensive, and here's why. You're going to pay more for Stephen King and Twilight because the big traditional publishers are corporations with big payrolls. They have many editors, secretaries, etc., etc. to feed. They also publish more than one or two books in a year. That requires coin. Furthermore, Stephen King and Twilight are responsible for making money for all the lesser-known authors who might not earn back the investment publishers make in them. Combine that with the cost of making paper books (ya know like ink, shipping, feeding the gnomes who blow on the binding glue to make it dry it faster, etc.), and you've got a formula for mark up.
Here's a pretty solid list of why traditional publishing is 'spensive.
It's a well known fact that most authors survive off of Saltine Crackers and various canned meat products, and they wouldn't know the difference between a board room and the Bahamas if you showed them a photo. (I kid, I kid!) So you see, the idea that an Indie author would be willing to price their baby at a scant .99 cents and think they were making a killing isn't that far fetched.
I'd like to point out that at this point no crimes were committed--by either party--and no animals were harmed during the making of the price war. Traditional publishers have a right to determine what an acceptable profit is, as do Indie authors. As with most things, however, the actual decision is going to come down to consumers.
I say tomato, you say I'm destroying an entire industry
There has been A LOT of mudslinging in the transition from paper to electronic publishing ...
Let's pause for a sec to clarify something: It is a transition. Not a fad. Not a phenomenon. Not a tryst. This is a lasting change to how we primarily consume a product. Proof? I just got my nearly 70 year old dad an eReader for Father's Day on Wednesday of last week. He told me on the phone this morning that he has already read half a book on it even though he didn't think he'd ever use it. It seems he really likes being able to enlarge the font. Now he wants to know how to get some of his favorite old paper books on it! Call it anecdotal if you want, but for my money when the "old folks" are buying in, the "change" has already come and gone.
Back on task, everyone (including me ... wait for it) has seemingly had an opinion about what has happened to the publishing industry. Readers, authors, publishers, editors, agents, Wall Street, grandfathers, granddaughters--you name it--have expressed everything from joy to dismay over the first real change to come to the reading medium since we swapped out stone for papyrus.
With those opinions have come accusations and prognostications. Accusations of wrong doing and right doing in the transition, prognostications of good things and bad things still to come. I've applauded some, laughed at others and scoffed at most.
The biggest bur to stick under my saddle of late is the scuttlebutt over book pricing. Former literary agent and current author, Nathan Bransford, posted this poll last week to essentially gauge what the perceived value of a $25 hardback paper book in eBook form is. He had posted a similar poll last year and the results were compared. The highly unscientific, yet utterly compelling, findings showed that a year ago 63% of the folks who voted believed an acceptable price for the eBook version of a $25 paper book was greater than $10. This year, 72% went the opposite direction and said that the eBook version should be priced below $10. Even as a somewhat random sample that's a pretty big shift.
Nathan isn't the first person to illustrate or surmise that the value of a book is falling. Consumers are starting to speak up. THIS EXCELLENT ARTICLE (highly, highly recommended) posted back in March on The Digital Reader noted that of the top 20 bestselling eBooks on Amazon, 9 were priced at $1 or less. With this evidence in hand a number of people have started predicting a day when all books are free, because no one will be willing to pay for them. I've also read a number of hostile comments directed toward the authors who are pricing their books in the bargain basement, blaming them for hastening the collapse of the written word's value.
Let's pump the brakes, m'Kay?
Here are my reasonings (told you I had 'em) for why we shouldn't go all 2012 on books just yet:
I'd like to point out that at this point no crimes were committed--by either party--and no animals were harmed during the making of the price war. Traditional publishers have a right to determine what an acceptable profit is, as do Indie authors. As with most things, however, the actual decision is going to come down to consumers.
I say tomato, you say I'm destroying an entire industry
There has been A LOT of mudslinging in the transition from paper to electronic publishing ...
Let's pause for a sec to clarify something: It is a transition. Not a fad. Not a phenomenon. Not a tryst. This is a lasting change to how we primarily consume a product. Proof? I just got my nearly 70 year old dad an eReader for Father's Day on Wednesday of last week. He told me on the phone this morning that he has already read half a book on it even though he didn't think he'd ever use it. It seems he really likes being able to enlarge the font. Now he wants to know how to get some of his favorite old paper books on it! Call it anecdotal if you want, but for my money when the "old folks" are buying in, the "change" has already come and gone.
Back on task, everyone (including me ... wait for it) has seemingly had an opinion about what has happened to the publishing industry. Readers, authors, publishers, editors, agents, Wall Street, grandfathers, granddaughters--you name it--have expressed everything from joy to dismay over the first real change to come to the reading medium since we swapped out stone for papyrus.
With those opinions have come accusations and prognostications. Accusations of wrong doing and right doing in the transition, prognostications of good things and bad things still to come. I've applauded some, laughed at others and scoffed at most.
The biggest bur to stick under my saddle of late is the scuttlebutt over book pricing. Former literary agent and current author, Nathan Bransford, posted this poll last week to essentially gauge what the perceived value of a $25 hardback paper book in eBook form is. He had posted a similar poll last year and the results were compared. The highly unscientific, yet utterly compelling, findings showed that a year ago 63% of the folks who voted believed an acceptable price for the eBook version of a $25 paper book was greater than $10. This year, 72% went the opposite direction and said that the eBook version should be priced below $10. Even as a somewhat random sample that's a pretty big shift.
Nathan isn't the first person to illustrate or surmise that the value of a book is falling. Consumers are starting to speak up. THIS EXCELLENT ARTICLE (highly, highly recommended) posted back in March on The Digital Reader noted that of the top 20 bestselling eBooks on Amazon, 9 were priced at $1 or less. With this evidence in hand a number of people have started predicting a day when all books are free, because no one will be willing to pay for them. I've also read a number of hostile comments directed toward the authors who are pricing their books in the bargain basement, blaming them for hastening the collapse of the written word's value.
Let's pump the brakes, m'Kay?
- The Entertainer: Entertainment and talent have always carried a price tag. People will pay to escape. People will pay to enjoy and whiteness things they cannot, or are not willing to do themselves. It's why we have sports. It's why we have Lady Ga Ga. If you can offer an experience of value, someone will pay for it. From puppet shows in the street to sold out arenas; if you build it, they will come.
- A Change Will Do You Good: eBooks are a market in flux. It is still way too early to nail down the market price. Case in point: Back in March 9 out of the top 20 Amazon bestsellers were under $1. As of this evening, only 1 out of the top 20. A month from now it will probably be 15 out of 20. Based upon the survey mentioned above, I'm not even sure readers know what an electronic book is worth to them. While I'm pretty sure it isn't what a paper book is worth, I'm also pretty sure it isn't nothing. (That's coming from a reader, not a writer.)
- "I'd Buy That For A Dollar": Worth is highly subjective. Some people wouldn't pay more than $30 for a meal, but would sell everything they own for a new Harry Potter book. Others would pay thousands of $$$ for a bottle of wine but not pay anything for digital content they can pirate for free on the Internet. As such, there will never be "an agreed upon" price for anything.
- Look To The Past, Not The Future: The music industry went through a similar shift not all that long ago. People predicted horrible things when consumers were allowed to download their favorite tracks for .99c instead of being obligated to purchase an entire album for $15. The same mantra of, "Pretty soon we'll be giving it away!" was shouted then. (Actually, it is still being shouted by Jon Bon Jovi. :) Here's a news release from 2005 explaining how Apple and the Big Record Companies were butting heads over the issue. The reality is that the music industry for MUSICIANS and LISTENERS has never been better. What about the Big Record Companies? Not so much. Draw what conclusions you will, but I for one think authors and readers will be fine.
- "A Hamburger Today ...": Fastfood restaurants have been waging the price war for years, yet I still have to pay .99c for a hamburger. Shouldn't it be free already? If piracy and price cutting were truly the ingredients for "free" I tend to think my next iTunes purchase would be $0 instead of $9.99. There is a bottom line for everything, and that bottom line will be set by the people who make a living off of the goods and services being provided. An author won't work for free so long as there are readers who covet their stories. Why? Because milk and eggs aren't free.
At the end of the day I think that authors just need write good stories. The money and accolades will come if there is justification for it.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Are cheap eBooks going to devalue literature to the point that no one is willing to pay for it? Are we headed toward a future where authors, like classical composers of old, are hired by private investors to craft stories that will be free to the public?
~EJW~
Posts
